|
What is the concern about Avandia?
Recently, the New England Journal of Medicine released an
analysis by Dr. Nissen linking Avandia to an increased risk
of heart attacks as a side affect of Avandia. The analysis
was based on data gathered from public sources, and combined
42 studies, a form of research called a meta-analysis.
The analysis showed a 43% higher risk of heart attacks among
patients taking Avandia, compared with what Avandia was being
compared against in clinical trials. The analysis showed a
64% elevated rate of cardiovascular death, though this didn't
meet a standard statistical test for significance. Among people
in Dr. Nissen's analysis who took Avandia, the rate of heart
attack was between 0.43% and 1.85%, while the cardiovascular-death
rate was between 0.14% and 0.51%.
The results of a meta-analysis aren't considered as strong
as those from a single large clinical trial. However, Dr.
Nissen calls the analysis "very concerning." An
editorial that accompanied the analysis in the medical journal
said that "regulatory action by the Food and Drug Administration
is now warranted," and "the rationale for prescribing
[Avandia] at this time is unclear."
GlaxoSmithKline PLC, which makes Avandia, said in a statement
that it "strongly disagrees" with the side affect
findings, which the company said were based on "incomplete
evidence and a methodology that the author admits has significant
limitations."
|